In This Article Edwards Attacks the Cosmological Argument, Specifically Aquinas's

question 9

True/False

In this article Edwards attacks the cosmological argument, specifically Aquinas's causal and contingency versions, holding that the argument fails at several points. Against the causal argument, he argues that the premise asserting the impossibility of an infinite series is false. Even if the argument were sound, he says, it would not prove the existence of a single first cause because a plurality of causes cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, the argument is not helped by the theist's distinction between causes that bring something into existence (causes in fieri) and causes that sustain something in existence (causes in esse). Some defend the causal argument by insisting that even if there were an infinite series of causes, there still must be an ultimate cause of the series as a whole. Edwards counters that such notions rest on the "erroneous assumption that the series is something over and above the members of which it is composed." Against the contingency argument, Edwards maintains that to explain a contingent phenomenon, we do not need to posit a necessary being and that those who make such a demand beg the question at issue.
-Paley proves the existence of the God of traditional theism.

---

Definitions:

Will Power

The ability to control one's own actions, emotions, or impulses, and the capacity to persist in challenging situations.

Staff Motivated

A condition in which employees are inspired, engaged, and driven to achieve organizational goals and objectives.

Cognitive Process

Mental activities and operations that include thinking, remembering, problem-solving, and decision-making.

Authentic Leadership

A style of leadership that emphasizes the genuine and transparent connection between leaders and their followers, focusing on integrity, ethical values, and the ability to be oneself.