Examlex
In this selection Churchland examines functionalism and the two prominent versions of materialism in philosophy of mind. Reductivism claims that there is an identity of mental states with brain states. Functionalism rejects any one-to-one correlation between mental types and physical types and concentrates on the relationship between inputs and outputs. For example, the mental event of pain could be similar in two beings that have altogether different types of bodies and brains. Most functionalists are materialists, but someone could be a functionalist and be a nonmaterialist. Eliminative materialism is more radical than either of these other theories and seeks to eliminate "folk psychology"-talk of beliefs, feelings, and perceptions-in favor of more scientific descriptions of what is going on in the brain. Churchland concludes that the truth may be a combination of the two materialist theories, although the evidence points more in the direction of eliminativism.
-Fodor believes that behaviorism is at odds with modern psychology.
Q2: Hick says there is no real difference
Q3: Epictetus claims that someone with the position
Q5: Camus says that one cannot imagine Sisyphus
Q5: Demea is interested in proving the existence
Q7: Aristotle says that a good man chooses
Q7: Philonous concludes that God exists because<br>A) material
Q8: Chisholm rejects compatibilism.
Q10: Mill says that a very common view
Q11: Hume thinks a person is nothing but
Q14: According to Churchland, the inverted-spectrum thought experiment