Examlex
Rachels analyzes the structure of ethical relativism, which he calls "cultural relativism," to show that the claims made by its proponents go beyond what the facts or arguments can establish. He contends that the central argument, "the cultural difference argument," is invalid because even if there is broad cultural disagreement over morality, it does not prove that there is no truth in the matter any more than the fact that flat-Earthers disagree with round-Earthers proves that there is no independent truth of that matter. Rachels points out three unfavorable consequences of cultural relativism that make it implausible. He also points out two virtues of the doctrine.
-If cultural relativism were true, we could no longer say that the customs of other societies are
Monopolistically Competitive
Describes a market structure where many firms sell products that are similar but not identical, allowing for competition based on product differentiation.
Financial Planners
Professionals who help individuals and organizations create programs to meet long-term financial goals, such as retirement, education, and investment strategies.
Similar Substitutes
Products or services that satisfy the same needs or desires and can be used in place of one another.
Differentiated Products
Goods and services that are distinguished from similar products by characteristics like quality, design, performance, and branding.
Q3: Locke argues that a social contract requires
Q5: Baier believes that Gilligan challenges the liberal
Q5: Pojman appeals to a pragmatic argument similar
Q6: d'Holbach says that it is impossible for
Q6: Frankfurt says that his conception of freedom
Q9: What makes killing wrong in Marquis's view
Q12: Moore argues that skepticism is false.
Q12: Warren thinks that the concept of a
Q13: Benedict claims that some cultures are better
Q13: According to Russell, those who appeal to