When Dictators Liberalize in an Attempt to Co-Opt Opposition Groups

question 13

Multiple Choice

When dictators liberalize in an attempt to co-opt opposition groups, they are trying to strengthen their hold on power. If they miscalculate and assume that the opposition is weak when in fact it is strong, their liberalizing attempts might embolden the opposition groups and eventually lead to a democratic transition. But if the opposition group is actually weak, and the dictator mistakenly thinks it is strong, then the dictator will not dare to liberalize in the first place, which is unfortunate for civil society whose members could have benefited from the liberalization. If you were a member of the opposition (civil society) and you were interested in a transition to democracy, or at least a liberalization of the regime, would you be better off in the situation in which the dictator (liberalizers) knew for sure the exact strength of civil society, or in the situation in which the dictator was uncertain whether civil society was strong or not?

• A) The opposition is always better off under conditions of certainty.
• B) The opposition is always better off under conditions of uncertainty.
• C) It would depend on whether the opposition was strong or weak. A weak opposition would prefer certainty, but a strong opposition would probably prefer uncertainty.

---

Definitions:

Restrictive Covenant

In property law, a condition imposed by the seller as to what the purchaser can use the land for; in employment law, a commitment not to work in a certain geographical area for a designated period of time.

Easement

The right of a person other than the owner to use a portion of private property.

Prescription

A health care professional's formal instruction authorizing a patient to be provided a medicine or treatment.

Strata Regulations

Laws or rules governing strata properties, which are typically multi-unit housing complexes with individual ownership of units and shared ownership of common areas.