Examlex
show that the given formula is a logical truth of M, using the rules of inference including conditional or indirect proof.
-∼(∃x)(Px • Qx) ≡ (∀x)(Px ⊃ ∼Qx)
Insanity Defence
A legal defense by an accused person claiming that they should not be held legally responsible for their actions due to episodic or persistent psychiatric diseases at the time of criminal act.
Evolution
The process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
Mental Disorder
A condition characterized by disordered thought, mood, or behavior that causes significant distress or impairment in personal functioning.
Legal Arguments
Reasoning and debate used in the practice of law to advocate for or against certain interpretations of the law, typically presented in legal documents or in court settings.
Q7: If a government runs a budget deficit
Q8: In which decade did FDI become an
Q41: Which of the following created inflation in
Q42: In Latin America, the equation of exchange
Q71: Everyone is a theist unless someone
Q142: Which of the following propositions is
Q186: Which of the following propositions is an
Q190: [(E ≡ ∼F) <span class="ql-formula"
Q244: 1. (∀x)Ix ⊃ (∀x)Kx<br>2. (∀x)[Jx •
Q295: Consider assuming '(∃x)(Px • Qx)' for a