Economists Have Long Debated Whether There Is a Significant Loss

question 223

Multiple Choice

Economists have long debated whether there is a significant loss of well-being to society in markets that are monopolistically competitive rather than perfectly competitive.Which of the following offers the best reason why some economists believe that monopolistically competitive markets are less efficient than perfectly competitive markets?

• A)In contrast to perfectly competitive markets, neither allocative efficiency nor productive efficiency are achieved in monopolistically competitive markets.
• B)In contrast to perfectly competitive markets, firms in monopolistically competitive markets earn economic profits in long-run equilibrium.
• C)In contrast to perfectly competitive markets, firms in monopolistically competitive markets do not produce where price equals average total cost in long-run equilibrium.
• D)In contrast to perfectly competitive markets, firms in monopolistically competitive markets can charge a price greater than average total cost in the short run.

---

Definitions:

Situational Ethnicity

The concept that one's ethnic identity can be fluid and change in different social contexts.

Difference

A distinct separation or variation between two or more things, often highlighting unique characteristics or qualities.

Prejudice

Preconceived opinions or judgments toward individuals or groups without factual basis, often involving negative attitudes or discrimination.

Generalizations

Statements or conclusions made based on common characteristics that apply to a group or category rather than specific instances.