Identify an Instance Where the Second Statement Explains the Reason

question 30

Multiple Choice

Identify an instance where the second statement explains the reason for the first statement.

• A) Statement 1: Negotiations ended in a "walking away from the table" situation. Statement 2: The negotiator was driven by hubris.
• B) Statement 1: Negotiators failed to recognize and capitalize on their win-win potential. Statement 2: Negotiation was conducted in a protected environment.
• C) Statement 1: One of the negotiators made large concessions, resulting in a too-small share of the bargaining pie. Statement 2: The negotiator was driven by pride and ego.
• D) Statement 1: The best alternative was not chosen in a negotiation. Statement 2: Both the parties were not interested in the outcome of the negotiation.

---

Definitions:

Liability

The legal responsibility of an individual for his or her actions.

Fur Coat

A coat made from the fur of animals, worn for warmth or as a fashion statement.

Bailment

The act of temporarily transferring physical possession of personal property by one party (the bailor) to another (the bailee) for a specific purpose.

Mutuum

A loan of goods with the intention that the goods may be used and later replaced with an equal amount of different goods.