Examlex

Solved

In a Monte Carlo Study, Econometricians Generate Multiple Sample Regression

question 5

Essay

In a Monte Carlo study, econometricians generate multiple sample regression functions from a known population regression function. For example, the population regression function could be Yi = ?0 + ?1Xi = 100 - 0.5 Xi. The Xs could be generated randomly or, for simplicity, be nonrandom ("fixed over repeated samples"). If we had ten of these Xs, say, and generated twenty Ys, we would obviously always have all observations on a straight line, and the least squares formulae would always return values of 100 and 0.5 numerically. However, if we added an error term, where the errors would be drawn randomly from a normal distribution, say, then the OLS formulae would give us estimates that differed from the population regression function values. Assume you did just that and recorded the values for the slope and the intercept. Then you did the same experiment again (each one of these is called a "replication"). And so forth. After 1,000 replications, you plot the 1,000 intercepts and slopes, and list their summary statistics.
In a Monte Carlo study, econometricians generate multiple sample regression functions from a known population regression function. For example, the population regression function could be Y<sub>i</sub> = ?<sub>0</sub> + ?<sub>1</sub>X<sub>i</sub> = 100 - 0.5 X<sub>i</sub>. The Xs could be generated randomly or, for simplicity, be nonrandom ( fixed over repeated samples ). If we had ten of these Xs, say, and generated twenty Ys, we would obviously always have all observations on a straight line, and the least squares formulae would always return values of 100 and 0.5 numerically. However, if we added an error term, where the errors would be drawn randomly from a normal distribution, say, then the OLS formulae would give us estimates that differed from the population regression function values. Assume you did just that and recorded the values for the slope and the intercept. Then you did the same experiment again (each one of these is called a  replication ). And so forth. After 1,000 replications, you plot the 1,000 intercepts and slopes, and list their summary statistics.   Here are the corresponding graphs:     Using the means listed next to the graphs, you see that the averages are not exactly 100 and -0.5. However, they are  close.  Test for the difference of these averages from the population values to be statistically significant.
Here are the corresponding graphs: In a Monte Carlo study, econometricians generate multiple sample regression functions from a known population regression function. For example, the population regression function could be Y<sub>i</sub> = ?<sub>0</sub> + ?<sub>1</sub>X<sub>i</sub> = 100 - 0.5 X<sub>i</sub>. The Xs could be generated randomly or, for simplicity, be nonrandom ( fixed over repeated samples ). If we had ten of these Xs, say, and generated twenty Ys, we would obviously always have all observations on a straight line, and the least squares formulae would always return values of 100 and 0.5 numerically. However, if we added an error term, where the errors would be drawn randomly from a normal distribution, say, then the OLS formulae would give us estimates that differed from the population regression function values. Assume you did just that and recorded the values for the slope and the intercept. Then you did the same experiment again (each one of these is called a  replication ). And so forth. After 1,000 replications, you plot the 1,000 intercepts and slopes, and list their summary statistics.   Here are the corresponding graphs:     Using the means listed next to the graphs, you see that the averages are not exactly 100 and -0.5. However, they are  close.  Test for the difference of these averages from the population values to be statistically significant. In a Monte Carlo study, econometricians generate multiple sample regression functions from a known population regression function. For example, the population regression function could be Y<sub>i</sub> = ?<sub>0</sub> + ?<sub>1</sub>X<sub>i</sub> = 100 - 0.5 X<sub>i</sub>. The Xs could be generated randomly or, for simplicity, be nonrandom ( fixed over repeated samples ). If we had ten of these Xs, say, and generated twenty Ys, we would obviously always have all observations on a straight line, and the least squares formulae would always return values of 100 and 0.5 numerically. However, if we added an error term, where the errors would be drawn randomly from a normal distribution, say, then the OLS formulae would give us estimates that differed from the population regression function values. Assume you did just that and recorded the values for the slope and the intercept. Then you did the same experiment again (each one of these is called a  replication ). And so forth. After 1,000 replications, you plot the 1,000 intercepts and slopes, and list their summary statistics.   Here are the corresponding graphs:     Using the means listed next to the graphs, you see that the averages are not exactly 100 and -0.5. However, they are  close.  Test for the difference of these averages from the population values to be statistically significant. Using the means listed next to the graphs, you see that the averages are not exactly 100 and -0.5. However, they are "close." Test for the difference of these averages from the population values to be statistically significant.


Definitions:

Blood Pressure

The force exerted by circulating blood upon the walls of blood vessels, an essential indicator of cardiovascular health.

Temperature Reading

The measurement of the body's internal heat level, typically done with a thermometer to assess health or detect fever.

Patient Safety

The prevention of harm to patients during the course of healthcare delivery.

Hypothalamus

A region of the brain that controls an enormous number of bodily functions, including temperature regulation, thirst, hunger, sleep, mood, and sexual desire.

Related Questions