Examlex
SFAS No 109 takes a decidedly different approach to the treatment of operating loss carryforwards.Under APB Opinion No.11,the presumption was that operating losses would not be realizable.As a result,the entity experiencing the loss would not provide for the effects of carryforwards in its financial statements until the benefits were in fact later realized for tax purposes.SFAS No.96 was even more stringent in its approach in that net deferred tax debits were prohibited to the extent they exceeded amounts which would be recoverable through operating loss carrybacks as of the date of the balance sheet.SFAS No.109 treats net operating loss carryforwards in the same manner as the tax effects of other deductible temporary differences and allow both to be recognized as deferred tax assets.The approach of SFAS No.109 has been criticized by some,however.
Required:
Identify what you perceive to be the weaknesses in the approach promulgated by SFAS No.109.
Q15: On December 31,2014,Value Corporation's current liabilities total
Q23: On January 1,2014,Reason Co.estimated a projected benefit
Q29: Selected information from the accounting records of
Q29: On December 31,2014,Ohio Corporation appropriately changed its
Q37: The components of net periodic pension expense
Q46: Mako's Distributing purchased equipment on January 1,2011.The
Q53: Under international accounting standards,remote contingent liabilities are<br>A)not
Q59: Ignoring income taxes,choose the correct response below
Q76: Information concerning Santori Corporation's intangible assets is
Q76: The accounting profession has wrestled for many