Write a Complete Analysis Plus Evaluation for Each of the Following

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is This passage contains an argument. The issue is whether we can count on seeing the stock market rebound. The conclusion is that we can count on seeing the stock market rebound. The first premise is that if the government does not do something about white-collar crime, then we will not have a rebound in the stock market. The second premise is that the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime.
This passage contains a subargument. The intermediate conclusion is that the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime. The premise is that Congress demands action.
This passage is a deductive truth-functional argument. It is invalid because it is the form of denying the antecedent, as is shown in the translation below.

\begin{array}{l}\sim \mathrm{G} \supset \sim \mathrm{R} \ \underline{\mathrm{G}} \ herefore \mathrm{R}\end{array}

1. If the government does not do something about white-collar crime, then we will not have a rebound in the stock market. Since 2. the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime because 3. Congress demands action, 4.we can count on seeing the stock market rebound.
$This passage contains an argument. The issue is whether we can count on seeing the stock market rebound. The conclusion is that we can count on seeing the stock market rebound. The first premise is that if the government does not do something about white-collar crime, then we will not have a rebound in the stock market. The second premise is that the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime. This passage contains a subargument. The intermediate conclusion is that the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime. The premise is that Congress demands action. This passage is a deductive truth-functional argument. It is invalid because it is the form of denying the antecedent, as is shown in the translation below. \begin{array}{l}\sim \mathrm{G} \supset \sim \mathrm{R} \ \underline{\mathrm{G}} \ herefore \mathrm{R}\end{array} 1. If the government does not do something about white-collar crime, then we will not have a rebound in the stock market. Since 2. the government will certainly be doing something about white-collar crime because 3. Congress demands action, 4.we can count on seeing the stock market rebound.$

Write a Complete Analysis Plus Evaluation for Each of the Following

Definitions: