Which of the Following Best Expresses the Court's Ruling in the Case

question 90

Multiple Choice

Which of the following best expresses the court's ruling in the case nugget Jackson v.Bumble Bee Seafoods Inc. ,in which the plaintiff sued after small fish bones were found in canned tuna fish eaten by the plaintiff?

• A)That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of merchantability because even though bones are not a foreign substance in fish,they are not expected in small pieces of tuna fish.
• B)That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish and should have been expected.
• C)That the plaintiff could not recover because no food has warranties attached to it.
• D)That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
• E)That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.

Analyze the relationship between core values, corporate culture, and ethical decision-making within firms.

Explore the impact of international and cultural differences on ethical decision-making and organizational ethics.

Familiarize with moral philosophies and principles, such as John Rawls' veil of ignorance and the difference principle, and their application to ethics.

Understand the characteristics and formation of braided streams.

---

Definitions:

Production

The process of creating goods or services through the combination of labor, materials, and technology, which contributes to economic output.

Maximum Profit

The highest possible financial gain that a company can achieve in a given period under existing conditions.

Natural Monopoly

A market condition in which a single supplier is more efficient in producing the product than any other potential producers due to high fixed or startup costs.

Electricity

A form of energy resulting from the existence of charged particles, used as a power source.