Examlex
Julia Annas: Being Virtuous and Doing the Right Thing
Annas begins by describing the orthodox way of doing ethics in the twentieth century. The standard aim of ethical theory, she maintains, has been the search for a decision procedure - i.e., a specific set of instructions for how to act that applies to everyone in the same way. Annas believes that this "manual model" of ethics should be rejected, and replaced with the approach offered by virtue ethics.
Before turning to her virtue-based approach, Annas offers three main criticisms of the manual model of ethics. First, the manual model predicts there could be moral savants. But, unlike in mathematics, there are no moral savants. Children are moral idiots. Second, the manual model makes possible a person brilliant at giving moral advice, while having a character and values that are morally detestable. But this, Annas claims, is absurd. Third, and most importantly by Annas's lights, the manual model of morality give specific and decisive answers concerning what we should do - i.e., we are told what to do. But we do not want morality dictating our lives around. Aren't we, Annas questions, losing an important sense in which we should be making our own decisions? Virtue ethics, Annas claims, avoids these problems.
According to Annas, we should think of becoming virtuous on the lines of learning to be a builder. To become a better builder you start by picking a role model and copying what she does. Slowly, you learn to build better, engaging in the activity in a way which is less dependent on the examples of others and expresses more understanding of your own. Finally, you progress from piecemeal understanding of building to a more unified understanding of building. You have, that is, become a good builder. Being morally good, Annas argues, proceeds in this same way. We look to virtuous human beings, and the practical wisdom they demonstrate, so that we too can become virtuous - doing the right thing, for the right reasons, with the right motive. In short, we learn to live virtuous lives by acting as the virtuous person acts, until we can grasp what virtue demands for ourselves. Thus, just as what is right for one acquiring a skill depends on her stage of development, the morally right action differs depending on where the agent is in her development of a virtuous character.
-Annas objects to the manual model of ethics on the grounds that it:
Entropy
Disorderliness; a quantitative measure of the amount of the random, disordered energy that is unavailable to do work.
Cofactor
A nonprotein substance needed by an enzyme for normal activity; some cofactors are inorganic (usually metal ions); others are organic (coenzymes).
Enzymes
Biological catalysts that speed up chemical reactions in cells without being consumed in the process.
Enthalpy
Enthalpy is a measurement of the total heat content of a system, reflecting the energy needed to create a system and the energy needed to make room for it by displacing its environment.
Q1: According to Anscombe, the concept of moral
Q2: An action is deliberatively justified if and
Q6: According to Dewey, the problem of valuation
Q8: Gauthier defines "utility" as:<br>A) pleasure..<br>B) happiness.<br>C) considered
Q8: Nagel claims that the idea of agency
Q9: Mackie objects to noncognitivism on the grounds
Q15: Foot claims that in the Rescue cases:<br>A)
Q20: Gauthier claims that we must accept the
Q23: Annas draws an analogy between becoming virtuous
Q32: Herman believes that Kant accepts:<br>A) the "battle