Examlex
Travis Timmerman: A Reply to Singer
In "A Reply to Singer," Travis Timmerman examines Peter's Singer argument for the claim that we are morally obligated to donate most of our expendable income to aid organizations. Timmerman focuses on the second premise of Singer's argument (which states that if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable importance, we ought, morally, to do it) , and argues (i) that Singer fails to justify the truth of this premise and (ii) that there are positive reasons to reject it.
Singer's defense of his second premise rests on the famous "Drowning Child" thought experiment. According to Singer, our intuitive moral reaction to this thought experiment-that it is wrong not to save the life of a drowning child at the expense of new clothes-shows that we already accept the truth of his premise, at least implicitly. Timmerman disagrees. Because we rarely, if ever, find ourselves in the position Singer describes, our intuitive reaction to the "Drowning Child" case is informed, according to Timmerman, by the implicit assumption that it describes an anomalous, one-off event. Timmerman then points out that an intuitive conviction that it is wrong not to make a single, one-time monetary sacrifice to save the life of a child is not the same as, nor does it entail, the belief that we are obligated to spend our entire lives repeatedly making similar sacrifices, as Singer's premise requires of people in situations like ours. Singer's attempt to justify his second premise-by showing that our moral intuitions reveal we already accept it-therefore fails on Timmerman's view.
Timmerman next argues that if we consider a more relevant analogy ("Drowning Children") , in which a person is in a position to save many drowning children everyday over the course of her entire life at comparably insignificant personal cost, our moral intuitions actually conflict with Singer's second premise. Timmerman therefore concludes that not only do our commonsense moral intuitions fail to support Singer's second premise, they also reveal that people positively reject the truth of the premise.
-According to Singer's view, the "Drowning Child" case shows that:
Enzymes
Biological molecules that significantly speed up the rate of virtually all of the chemical reactions that take place within cells.
Business Suits
Formal attire typically worn in professional settings, consisting of a jacket and trousers or a skirt made from matching fabric.
Eleventh Century
The period extending from the year 1001 to 1100 in the Common Era, characterized by various historical and cultural developments worldwide.
Soap Production
The process of making soap, which typically involves the chemical reaction between a fat or oil and an alkali to produce glycerin and soap.
Q5: According to Nagel, our beliefs are always
Q12: In Sinnott-Armstrong's view, we can deny moral
Q12: Midgley maintains that if we accept something
Q12: Annas maintains that an action is right
Q17: What all existentialists have in common, according
Q17: According to Harman, some observations are "theory
Q19: According to Singer, governments as well as
Q20: Thomson accepts Foot's second principle but rejects
Q25: The second premise of Singer's argument states:<br>A)
Q26: Rachels claims that:<br>A) there is no moral