Examlex
Travis Timmerman: A Reply to Singer
In "A Reply to Singer," Travis Timmerman examines Peter's Singer argument for the claim that we are morally obligated to donate most of our expendable income to aid organizations. Timmerman focuses on the second premise of Singer's argument (which states that if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable importance, we ought, morally, to do it) , and argues (i) that Singer fails to justify the truth of this premise and (ii) that there are positive reasons to reject it.
Singer's defense of his second premise rests on the famous "Drowning Child" thought experiment. According to Singer, our intuitive moral reaction to this thought experiment-that it is wrong not to save the life of a drowning child at the expense of new clothes-shows that we already accept the truth of his premise, at least implicitly. Timmerman disagrees. Because we rarely, if ever, find ourselves in the position Singer describes, our intuitive reaction to the "Drowning Child" case is informed, according to Timmerman, by the implicit assumption that it describes an anomalous, one-off event. Timmerman then points out that an intuitive conviction that it is wrong not to make a single, one-time monetary sacrifice to save the life of a child is not the same as, nor does it entail, the belief that we are obligated to spend our entire lives repeatedly making similar sacrifices, as Singer's premise requires of people in situations like ours. Singer's attempt to justify his second premise-by showing that our moral intuitions reveal we already accept it-therefore fails on Timmerman's view.
Timmerman next argues that if we consider a more relevant analogy ("Drowning Children") , in which a person is in a position to save many drowning children everyday over the course of her entire life at comparably insignificant personal cost, our moral intuitions actually conflict with Singer's second premise. Timmerman therefore concludes that not only do our commonsense moral intuitions fail to support Singer's second premise, they also reveal that people positively reject the truth of the premise.
-In Timmerman's view, donating most of our income to aid agencies is:
General Partners
General partners are individuals in a partnership who are responsible for the operations of the business and are personally liable for the partnership's debts and obligations.
Management
The process or practice of directing and controlling a group or organization towards achieving set goals or objectives.
Joint Venture
An association between two or more parties wherein the parties share profits and management responsibilities with respect to a specific project.
Community Fair
A public event organized within a community, often showcasing local arts, crafts, and culture, and providing entertainment and activities for the members of the community.
Q2: According to Sartre, existentialism leads to a
Q4: Foot claims that turning off a respirator
Q15: According to Midgley, we could not condemn
Q16: According to Hanson, it is unreasonable to
Q22: Shue believes that his three principles of
Q23: Annas draws an analogy between becoming virtuous
Q24: According to Wolf-Devine, affirmative action is often
Q28: Thomson claims that we can solve the
Q28: Foot defines a positive duty as:<br>A) a
Q29: According to Thomson, we should not be