Examlex
Thomas Nagel: Death
Suppose that death is the permanent end of human existence. If so, is death bad for the person who dies? Some argue that such a claim is senseless, on the grounds that nothing can be bad for a person who no longer exists. Nagel rejects these arguments, and defends the view that death is bad for us. In Nagel's view, death is not bad because of any of the positive features of death, but because it deprives us of the goods that life contains. Nagel defends his view from three objections.
The first objection is based on the assumption that nothing can be good or bad for someone unless it is experienced as pleasant or unpleasant. Because the dead do not experience anything, it seems that death cannot be bad for us. Nagel responds by denying the assumption behind the objection. We can be harmed by people betraying us behind our backs and without our knowledge, and we can even be harmed by people neglecting our wishes after our deaths.
The second objection is that death cannot be bad for a person, because after death there is simply no subject for which anything can be good or bad. In response, Nagel claims that it would be bad for a person to be reduced to the cognitive level of an infant, even if he remained perfectly content. The badness of such a fate is not undermined by the contention that the original person no longer exists, for the badness is grounded in the contrast between what actually transpired and possible alternatives. Such a fate is bad because it deprives a person of potential goods. Nagel claims that death is similar in this respect.
The third, and final, objection is this: because we were not harmed by our prenatal nonexistence, we cannot be harmed by posthumous nonexistence. Nagel responds that although our nonexistence before our birth did not deprive us of anything, death deprives us of time that we would otherwise be alive. Ultimately, then, Nagel concludes that these three objections fail to undermine the thought that death is bad for us.
-The problem of temporal asymmetry was pointed out by the philosopher:
Data Breach
An incident where confidential, protected, or sensitive information is accessed, disclosed, or taken without authorization.
Apology
An expression of regret or sorrow for having caused inconvenience, harm, or offense, often accompanied by an acknowledgment of responsibility and a gesture of making amends.
Pragmatist Approach
A practical approach to problems and affairs that focuses on the success of the outcomes rather than the adherence to any abstract principles.
Purist Approach
A methodology or philosophy that advocates for maintaining the original or core principles of an ideology, discipline, or practice without incorporating external influences or innovations.
Q2: Nagel claims that the value of life
Q10: In the Holland case, the Supreme Court
Q11: How can you avoid plagiarism? Why is
Q16: The death penalty was used in England
Q16: In the United States, the age of
Q17: The United States Constitution gives U.S citizens
Q20: Allowing judges to override a jury and
Q20: According to Thomas, in a morally perfect
Q23: If the intended audience does not learn
Q31: According to Thomson, one way to test