Examlex

Solved

Consider the Following Model Yt = β0

question 28

Essay

Consider the following model Yt = β0 + Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? + ut where the superscript "e" indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or "permanent," income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? = Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? + λ(Xt - Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? );0 < λ < 1
(a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process.
(b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? = (1 - λ) Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? + λXt
Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? , Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large.
(c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to Consider the following model Yt = β0 + + ut where the superscript e indicates expected values.This may represent an example where consumption depends on expected,or permanent, income.Furthermore,let expected income be formed as follows: = + λ(Xt - );0 < λ < 1 (a)In the above expectation formation hypothesis,expectations are formed at the end of the period,say the 31st of December,if you had annual data.Give an intuitive explanation for this process. (b)Rewrite the expectations equation in the following form: = (1 - λ) + λXt Next,following the method used in your textbook,lag both sides of the equation and replace .Repeat this process by repeatedly substituting expression for , ,and so forth.Show that this results in the following equation: = λXt + λ(1-λ)Xt-1 + λ(1- λ)2 Xt-2 + ...+ λ(1- λ)n Xt-n + (1 - λ)n+1 Explain why it is reasonable to drop the last right hand side term as n becomes large. (c)Substitute the above expression into the original model that related Y to .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions? (d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a Koyck transformation. What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier? .Although you now have right hand side variables that are all observable,what do you perceive as a potential problem here if you wanted to estimate this distributed lag model without further restrictions?
(d)Lag both sides of the equation,multiply through by (1- λ),and subtract this equation from the equation found in (c).This is called a "Koyck transformation." What does the resulting equation look like? What is the error process? What is the impact effect (zero-period dynamic multiplier)of a unit change in X,and how does it differ from long run cumulative dynamic multiplier?

Definitions:

Psychotherapy

A treatment method for mental health conditions involving psychological techniques, used to help individuals understand and overcome their issues.

Cancer Patients

Individuals diagnosed with cancer, undergoing or having undergone treatment for the disease.

Distress

An adverse psychological state resulting from stress, characterized by anxiety, depression, or discomfort, that can negatively impact an individual’s functioning.

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

A type of cancer that starts in the lymphatic system, which is part of the body's immune system, characterized by tumors from lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell.

Related Questions

Q1: The Gauss-Markov theorem for multiple regression proves

Q6: You have collected data on individuals and

Q19: In time series data,it is useful to

Q30: At the Stock and Watson (http://www.pearsonhighered.com/stock_watson)website,go to

Q32: A VAR allows you to test joint

Q43: During the last few days before a

Q44: (Requires Internet access for the test question)<br>The

Q47: At the Stock and Watson (http://www.pearsonhighered.com/stock_watson)website go

Q54: Following Alfred Nobel's will,there are five Nobel

Q87: A noted psychic was tested for extrasensory